Ordinarily, I don't feed trolls, but when it's this easy to use them as examples of the mental illness known as "leftardedness" I can't resist--it *is* like bobbing for water.
And since my darling little troll calls himself Bob, so much the better!
So in case you were at risk of actually believing that left-wing nutters actually "care" about their fellow humans, or that they really are "tolerant" souls who can teach us judgmental conservatives a thing or three, witness his charming assessment of my situation:
What are you whining about? You did the "nasty" and you knew it's consequences- unlike us baby-killing liberals who only know how to hate everything sacred to neoconservatives and blind- I mean "true"- believers.
But it is good to see that you have a realistic understanding of who the real "babykillers" are (hint: NOT the US military as I'm sure Bob would've mentioned if he weren't so busy analyzing my sex life). By the way, liberals wouldn't have earned that label if they really knew the consequences of "the nasty" as you put it. So who is it who's confused about how babies are made? Or are you admitting that killing unborn babies is something liberals have so little problem doing that they don't bother to consider those consequences relevant at the time, their own pleasure being foremost on their minds (as per usual)?
And by the way, where in that post did I mention that I was a "true believer" (whatever that is) or a "neocon" (something I am not and have never been, neocons being those who took a traditinonally DEMOCRAT interventionist approach and sold it to previously conservative isolationist types like Bush)? I am neither.
Oh, I am a believer, if it's Jesus Christ we're talking about here. But I'm not a biblical literalist who thinks my shit don't stank. Never have been, never will be. Not that Bob would know this, being that he's too consumed with hatred and too obsessed with stereotypes and cliches that he indiscriminantly applies to anyone who has anything remotely nice to say about our soldiers or the war in Iraq (a policy I have criticized more than once, recently in fact, on this very site). I guess Bob is an all-or-nothing kinda guy. Either you're for the war or you're against it. You can't be of two minds about it, depending on the day, there are no "nuances," there's good and evil, bad guys and good guys....Sound familiar? Hey Bob, LOOK IN THE FUCKING MIRROR HYPOCRITE, life, just like the war, isn't black and white. Sheesh, you'd think someone who probably voted for John Kerry would know this.
Why don't you summon up some of that will power- you know- like the type that is going to sustain us through record budget deficits and long-term military failure in the Middle East- and apply it to keeping your legs closed. Pray that none of your off-spring have to fight in the civil war in Iraq that we unleashed with our poorly-thought-out invasion of a basket-case "nation". Thanks Rumsfeld!OK, first of all, my name isn't Donald, or Rumsfeld, it's DEB. I didn't start the war (and neither did he by the way--Congress, including many prominent Democrats, had a say in that, if you recall). As for civil war in Iraq, what civil war? No, seriously! In order to have a civil war you have to have enough order and structure to the government in the first place that people are rebelling against. That's not the state of the state in Iraq. Sectarian violence in pockets, spurred by foreign terrorist threats and intimidation (not to mention MONEY and criminal activity) is hardly a "civil war." The average Iraqi is just trying to get through each day alive, they are by no means preoccupied with either the overthrow of the government or the ousting of the US forces. Perhaps if you read something other than Daily Kos or the HuffPo you would know this. Try Michael Yon or some of the other independent journalists who are actually THERE, on the ground, reporting on what's really going on there, then tell me about the "civil war" in Iraq.
And way to indict every single Iraqi too! They are a "basket case of a 'nation'" in quotes? So you're saying they weren't even a country when we invaded them? So what's all this tripe about us violating international law by invading a "sovereign nation" unprovoked then? Either they were or were not a "nation," but you can't have it both ways. I also think it's pretty cold of you to refer to the whole country as a basket case as if they're not worth anyone worrying about. So what about the Sudan? Should we write them off as a "basket case" too? Just leave the people there to be slaughtered because they're so chaotic? What about the Balkans? Should we have kept our noses out of there too? I can't think of a place more riddled with civil war and more resembling a "basket case" when we started dropping bombs on them from 30,000 feet than there! Oh right, that was a liberal Democrat's war, meant to distract us from the President's oh-so-savvy judgment as to where he should park his penis when his charming wife was out of sight, so that was OK. Nothing to see there, move along....
As for budget deficits, funny thing about those, they aren't solely the result of war spending, they are the result of SPENDING SPENDING. A deficit makes no distinction. So if you're saying that we shouldn't be borrowing money hand over fist, I agree with you, but if you're saying the only place we need to cut is on military spending, I beg to differ. No one has been more critical of Bush's profligate spending than I. New medicare entitlements to the tune of hundreds of billions? Yeah, not my idea! A brand new, utterly useless department known as "Homeland Security?" Also not my idea. Not to mention half a dozen other massive expenditures that I didn't approve of. I'm a CONSERVATIVE, not a Bushbot. Perhaps you ought to familiarize yourself with the difference.
As for the discipline it will take to get through whatever economic downturn will come when the next (probably Democrat) President comes into office and decides that the way back to fiscal solvency is to tax the middle class to death, I think I've got it. I'm not the one sitting her dependent on the government for my housing, food, medical care and education. I have 2/3 equity in my house and a 30 year fixed mortgage--no sub-prime or variable sucker here! We also SAVE money, unlike most Americans, especially those standing with their hands out demanding their "fair share" from the government, whether they earned it or not. So I think we'll be OK. We may not live large, and we may have to tighten the belts somewhat, but we'll be just fine, so no need for your "concern."
As for my offspring, considering the first two are girls, I highly doubt they'll be drafted to go to any war, but if things got so bad that they were, you know what? If I were able to walk, I'd probably go with them, gun in hand, ready to fight and yes, to die for my country. In the meantime, I'm just damn grateful there are Americans who are smarter, braver and more willing to make sacrifices than the average narcissistic liberal like you Bob. They're over there now, they'll be over there next year, and probably the year after that, and it won't matter a whit whose ass is spreading in the desk chair in the Oval Office, we won't be out of Iraq, or the region, probably for the rest of my lifetime (or yours). We're still in Korea and Europe for crying out loud, what would make anyone expect otherwise?
Oh, and as for your latest missive:
Not only are you a dumb slut, but you make Anne Coulter look lovable. I
hope you puke in your husband's mouth.
Finally, my husband thanks you for your well-wishes and says he longs for the day when I'm willing and well enough to go near his mouth again with my own. He says little puke would be a small price to pay for the ecstasy that results from one of my kisses. Probably the reason I ended up in this condition in the first place wouldn't you say? It sure wasn't a result of how repulsive I am.
Posted by insomnomaniac at November 9, 2007 4:52 PM | TrackBack