The following op-ed appeared in--of all places--my former home paper, the Boston Globe.
WE ARE OFTEN preoccupied with milestones and numbers, and the death of the 2,000th American soldier in the war in Iraq has been an occasion for much reflection. This particular milestone comes at a time when President Bush is already reeling from a number of political blows. At present, fewer than 40 percent of Americans approve of Bush's handling of the war -- and 55 percent think we should not have gone to war against Saddam Hussein in the first place. The gloom is not surprising, considering that the main rationale originally given for the war -- Iraq's weapons of mass destruction -- has turned out to be a fiasco.But what if the pessimists turn out to be wrong in the long run?
Amid the bad news, a piece of good news has been eclipsed. On Oct. 25, the results of the Iraqi constitutional referendum were announced. The provisional constitution was approved by a 78 to 21 percent margin, though three provinces dominated by Sunni Arabs voted against it. (In one, the ''no" votes did not reach the two-thirds majority required to defeat the constitution.) United Nations observers confirmed that the outcome was untainted by fraud.For the first time ever, an Arab country has adopted a democratic constitution by referendum. Despite the threat of terrorism, Iraqi men and women went to the polls in massive numbers: Turnout was about 63 percent. In December, parliamentary elections are to be held. This may not be democracy as we know it: The draft Iraqi constitution enshrines Islam as the state religion (though it also prohibits discrimination based on gender and religion), and the people tend to vote as the clerics tell them. But surely, it is a positive step in a country long tyrannized by a bloody dictatorship.
Not that they'd opt to have roadside bombs going off left and right, but who knows? Perhaps the hope of being able to avoid or prevent such attacks is still better than the helpless hopeless feeling one must have living under a Saddam-type dictator. I don't know for sure, I can only guess, and what I find so ironic is that the very same people in this country who would accuse George Bush of being a dictator, and who would have us all believe that life during his "reign of terror" is the worst thing imaginable STILL would prefer that we had left the Iraqis so suffer under a man even they admit was "a bad guy" or in brief moments of sanity "an evil dictator."
Not that I'm carrying water for the Bushies right now--I'm not. I'd like a REAL Republican in office, but hey, I'll take him over John "the poor Sunnis aren't getting enough representation" Kerry any day of the week and twice on Sundays. The key point here is that while we are busy mourning the 2,000 soldiers who died in Iraq, we should take a moment to recognize what they helped accomplish. Unlike their brothers-in-arms in Somalia, Kosovo and yes, even Vietnam, their deaths have NOT been in vain.
OK, so I've been here a little over a week, and I feel like I've landed on MARS for how different just about everything is (in a GOOD way, trust me).
One of the most salient examples I can think of presented itself to me today as I was having a bagel and coffee at my local Brueggers with my daughter. There was a copy of a local paper on the table and when I turned to the "Letters to the Editor" section, I read the following:
"Forty years ago we had "poverty" in this country and President Johnson. $8 Trillion dollars later and we still have "poverty" in this country. Just think how many tanks and bombers that could have bought?"
Let's just say it would be a cold day in hell before any editor would print that in a Boston area local paper! Then again, maybe not even then. It gets awfully cold in "Beantown" and I still don't think it would happen.
It's official. I'm outta here on Saturday for good, with luck, rarely to return.
I will be a North Carolinian after that I guess, a "tar-heel" minus the accent. I can hardly wait.
My husband has been there for a week, and so far:
I think I'm gonna like my new home, and I don't even have my gun yet! (Kidding) What an irony it will be to be living in a place where you CAN get a gun, but every other person doesn't inspire you to want to use it on them! (Kidding again, sort of)
In other news...
And the icing on the cake? THE RED SOX LOST!
Pardon my glee, I always was a Yankee fan. You can take the Yankee out of NYC, but you can't take the NYC out of the Yankee!
Let's just hope you can take the yakee out of the northeast and leave it there. I'm no carpetbagger, that's for sure!
Wish us luck!
As of next week, this will be a CHARLOTTE BLOG!!!
If you value your sanity, do NOT go with Vonage. Stupid me, I fell for their ads ("People do stupid things...like pay too much for phone service") and yes, I spent less, but here's what I got for my "savings:"
And here's the clincher: In the three short months we've had the service, it's cost us MORE than Verizon would have for the same time period.
And today, a total of about 6 hours of daytime minutes (at approximately 40 cents/min) used because we were suddenly and irrevocably WITHOUT A PHONE at our house and had to use cell phones to make vital calls pertaining to our move!
Verizon would have been $49.99/month, period.
What the hell happened? Well, in preparation for our move outta here, I have been calling to set up shut-off for various utilities. With all others, you can "schedule" your shut-off for a future date. This is just how it's done so you can
a) Avoid making ten phone calls the day of a move
b) Avoid FORGETTING to shut something off and incurring charges beyond the point where you're using service
c) Avoid keeping new tenants/owners from turning on their service
Comcast had no problem with this
Keyspan and Mass Electric had no issue either
Even the alarm company had no problem with it!
But not Vonage, aparently, not like they TOLD me this would be an issuse though. What they did spend inordinate amounts of time telling me though was how I should transfer my number to my new location despite the fact that:
My husband was like "WHAT THE FUCK???? You mean NOW?" And the guy was like "Well, uh, yeah, isn't that what you wanted?"
NO DUMBASS! Not like you asked! Not like you LISTENED when I said I wanted to SCHEDULE shut-off for next week!
So my husband told him to undo what he did, but the guy could not. He'd rendered us cut-off from the outside world and couldn't do a thing to change it! We ripped him a new one and he simply hung up, leaving us without dial tone.
My husband called back on his cell phone and they told him they could only sign us up for a NEW contract, but we could cancel in 30 days if we wanted, but we probably wouldn't get the same number, and it would take at least 3 hours to turn it on again! My husband went through three different people, asking for supervisors each time, and coming up empty each time, and in the end, after 3 hours, NO PHONE!
So we called back AGAIN and they said "Oops, looks like someone didn't initiate the process, it will be on in three hours this time, promise" and said he'd call back to confirm.
Three hours later, no call back, no phone.
MEANWHILE, my fancy new connector in my alarm system is now a liability to me getting Verizon back. I have to have it removed for Verizon to work properly, but calling Verizon to sign up for service anew was the only way to get phone service again any time in this lifetime (and even that is taking overnight)!
So here I sit without phone service because one guy had his head so far up his ass this morning his ears were filled with his own fermenting festering SHIT.
This company is so awful, they couldn't find their way out of a paper bag. Use them at your own risk and remember, YOU GET WHAT YOU PAY FOR.
I've learned my lesson, never again.